The same people/government/world government/secret society that perfectly executed 9/11 somehow completely botched the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq?
The same people that are trying to enslave us with their financial system have somehow allowed their entire financial system to collapse in the matter of a few months?
The "Truthers" will have a clever response. The best part about conspiracies is that they explain EVERYTHING. So...
- If Iraq went great, it was part of their plan for oil. But now that's it is dreadful, it's part of the master plan to create chaos in the region!
- If the world economic system went great, it was part of their plan for world domination. But now that it is dreadful, it's all part a master plan for a new economic system!
You see, truthers can explain everything!
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
The Conspiracy Makes No Sense - Where was Iraq on 9/11?
Let's say I was behind 9/11. If my evil grand master plan was to give America a "self-inflicted wound," to terrorize it on 9/11 in order to invade Iraq - WOULDN'T I PLANT A SINGLE IRAQI ON THE HIJACKED PLANES?
15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi -- our major ally in the region. Why would the conspirators put them on the planes with no intention of invading Saudi Arabia? The others were from Egypt, Lebanon, and the UAE. NOT ONE WAS FROM IRAQ. NOR WAS THERE ANY EVIDENCE LINKING THE ATTACKS TO IRAQ.
In fact, Bush, Cheney, and their cronies spent the 2 years after 9/11 drumming up reasons for an invasion of Iraq, trying to link Saddam Hussein to the WTC attacks any false way they could, or to show that he had Weapons of Mass Distruction -- neither of which they ever found evidence for.
So tell me again why they would flawlessly plan 9/11 in order to invade Iraq, yet utterly fail to link 9/11 to Iraq?
The reality is much more obvious -- Bush used 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq, an attempt to bust into the Middle East and transform the region.
15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi -- our major ally in the region. Why would the conspirators put them on the planes with no intention of invading Saudi Arabia? The others were from Egypt, Lebanon, and the UAE. NOT ONE WAS FROM IRAQ. NOR WAS THERE ANY EVIDENCE LINKING THE ATTACKS TO IRAQ.
In fact, Bush, Cheney, and their cronies spent the 2 years after 9/11 drumming up reasons for an invasion of Iraq, trying to link Saddam Hussein to the WTC attacks any false way they could, or to show that he had Weapons of Mass Distruction -- neither of which they ever found evidence for.
So tell me again why they would flawlessly plan 9/11 in order to invade Iraq, yet utterly fail to link 9/11 to Iraq?
The reality is much more obvious -- Bush used 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq, an attempt to bust into the Middle East and transform the region.
Debunking the bullshit: Aaron Russo and Rockefeller
CLAIM: Aaron Russo was told by Nick Rockefeller, allegedly of the Rockefeller family, 11 months before 9/11 that there would be an event that would cause us to invade Iraq, Afghanistan, and Venezuela, eventually leading to the bankers controlling the world through implanting chips in our bodies.
THE BULLSHIT: Neither of these guys are who you're supposed to believe they are.
1) AARON RUSSO - Aaron Russo was a movie producer that became politically involved, started his own political party, then became Libertarian, did a standup show complaining about the powers of the federal government, stopped paying taxes, then did a movie about how taxes are illegal. You are telling me that the Rockefellers would confess their plans for world domination to this guy? That's like confessing your shoplifting plans to the Indian guy behind the counter at 7/11. Then he claims nonchalantly that the Council on Foreign Relations, a renowned policy think tank (here assumed to be part of the evil plot), wanted to recruit him? Him? A movie producer? A political nut? Recruited for a major policy institute?
2) NICK ROCKEFELLER - Google him -- the only info about this guy anywhere on the internet comes from Aaron Russo himself! Nick's a nobody, he's neither powerful nor important -- the only reliable info anyone has found is that he's a lawyer who does business in China and has served on some international think tanks -- nowhere does it even indicate that he is a member of the Rockefeller family. Not a single site that posts the video asks for facts, nor do they supply them. Why request facts when you have a video?
3) THE INTERVIEW - When friends see the video they usually say, well why would Aaron lie? He tells the story so convincingly to Alex Jones that it must be the truth.
The reality is that the interview was done years after Aaron was diagnosed with cancer, and just months before his eventual death. He had nothing to lose by claiming that 7 years earlier he had been given evidence that backed up something he had been arguing about for the previous 5 years of his life.
IN OTHER WORDS: A dying libertarian movie producer claims to have uncovered the secret to world domination from some random guy with an important last name. This is hearsay -- it doesn't stand up in court for a reason.
THE BULLSHIT: Neither of these guys are who you're supposed to believe they are.
1) AARON RUSSO - Aaron Russo was a movie producer that became politically involved, started his own political party, then became Libertarian, did a standup show complaining about the powers of the federal government, stopped paying taxes, then did a movie about how taxes are illegal. You are telling me that the Rockefellers would confess their plans for world domination to this guy? That's like confessing your shoplifting plans to the Indian guy behind the counter at 7/11. Then he claims nonchalantly that the Council on Foreign Relations, a renowned policy think tank (here assumed to be part of the evil plot), wanted to recruit him? Him? A movie producer? A political nut? Recruited for a major policy institute?
2) NICK ROCKEFELLER - Google him -- the only info about this guy anywhere on the internet comes from Aaron Russo himself! Nick's a nobody, he's neither powerful nor important -- the only reliable info anyone has found is that he's a lawyer who does business in China and has served on some international think tanks -- nowhere does it even indicate that he is a member of the Rockefeller family. Not a single site that posts the video asks for facts, nor do they supply them. Why request facts when you have a video?
3) THE INTERVIEW - When friends see the video they usually say, well why would Aaron lie? He tells the story so convincingly to Alex Jones that it must be the truth.
The reality is that the interview was done years after Aaron was diagnosed with cancer, and just months before his eventual death. He had nothing to lose by claiming that 7 years earlier he had been given evidence that backed up something he had been arguing about for the previous 5 years of his life.
IN OTHER WORDS: A dying libertarian movie producer claims to have uncovered the secret to world domination from some random guy with an important last name. This is hearsay -- it doesn't stand up in court for a reason.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
